|
What areas of a student’s program require ‘Partnering’?
Autism spectrum disorders are complicated in nature, and differ from
one student to the next. Therefore, it makes it imperative that ALL
areas of an educational program be discussed among the entire team.
This is especially true because many goals the child is striving toward
are being addressed by several people; especially communication, social
and behavioral goals that require a variety of settings for generalization.
If everyone is working toward a common goal, they must have a common
understanding of what to do and how to do it.
IDEA requires that decisions for children with
disabilities be reached in the following order:
- The child’s strengths and needs (what
he needs) be considered first
- Goals and instruction/services/modifications (what to do) are
developed based upon those strengths and needs
- Placement be decided (where to do it) based upon the goals/services/supports
that have been agreed upon
- And then to monitor for progress (how well did he learn those
goals given the instruction/ services/supports)
In other words…

With this formula in mind, the following table gives us an idea of
what types of decisions need to be discussed and decided upon by the
cooperative team.
Assessment areas
- Communication/language/speech
- Social skills
- Sensory issues
- Physical/motor skills
- Self-help/independence skills
- Environmental factors
- Cognitive ability
- Behavioral concerns, need for support plans
- Parent involvement options
- Leisure/recreation/play
- Assistive technology (if needed)
- Training needs of each team member
|
Design goals /supports/ services
- Meaningful annual goals and benchmarks for progress are
identified
- Appropriate teaching strategies are identified that will
lead toward progress in the annual goals
- Environmental factors - Structure, organization and predictability
strategies are described in a plan
- Parent involvement is determined based upon family needs,
abilities, and resources (i.e. time, knowledge)
- Identified needs for training is provided to team members
- All are determined by assessment results
and other shared team information and included in the student’s
IEP
|
Choose a placement
- The continuum of placement options are discussed and
- The location(s) that can most effectively allow for progress
toward goals is agreed upon (this could be more than
one location)
|
Continually monitor progress
- Using on-going methods
of measuring progress, instruction, strategies, etc. are reevaluated
and adapted as needed
|
It becomes clear when looking at this list, that one year-end meeting
is not adequate to address all areas of needed discussion. Discussion
needs to remain consistent throughout the year as problems occur, changes
in approach are needed, or decisions about short-term events (like
field trips, assemblies, substitute teachers, etc.) crop up.
|