ICAN home about ICAN Tour Modules Glossary Search  
Your Path: ICAN Home > Modules > Behavioral Interventions > Pivotal Response Intervention: Lecture Page 3
Characteristics assessment Academic Interventions Behavioral Interventions Communication Interventions Environmental Interventions Sensory Interventions Social Interventions

1 2 3 4 5 6

Individuals Who May Benefit from PRI

Forum References FAQ's Quiz Lecture Introduction Reported research on PRI has involved preschool children and children in primary grades (Hupp & Reitman, 2000; Koegel & Frea, 1993; Koegel, Koegel, Harrower et al., 1999; Pierce & Schreibman, 1997). However, Stahmer (1999) suggests that the approach is appropriate for individuals at varied stages of development. For example, a high school student with high-functioning autism may be taught to accept “no” without cursing through the use of PRI techniques such as self-monitoring.

A few prerequisite skills are recommended in the literature. That is, prior to beginning PRI, target individuals should demonstrate curiosity about the environment and manipulating items (e.g., toys), demonstrate imitation skills, and demonstrate few self-stimulatory behaviors that do not involve objects (Sherer & Schreibman, 1998; Stahmer, 1999). For example, an appropriate candidate for PRI might enjoy repeatedly flapping a kite, but would not engage in repetitive hand-flapping. Such an interest in objects could more easily be shaped into a communicative act.

Responding to Multiple Cues – How to Teach

To address the tendency of children with ASD to zero in on single attributes of tasks or items, Koegel et al. (1989) recommend teaching them to respond to multiple cues. Specifically, when instructions are being given to a student, they must contain more than one cue to which the student must attend. Lessons involving multiple cues give students directions that involve more than one descriptor. In addition, instructors who are teaching responding to multiple cues frequently comment on multiple attributes of items (Pierce & Schreibman, 1997). A couple of examples follow.

At snack time, Mr. A sets out two sizes of cup the children may use. Shantelle, who is holding a container of apple juice, asks, “cup,” to which Mr. A responds, “What size?” requiring a response of “large” or “small” from Shantelle.

Mr. A and Shantelle are in the hygiene area. Next to the sink is a basket with a blue toothbrush, a yellow toothbrush, a blue hair brush, and a brown hair brush.
Mr. A: “Shantelle, get the blue hair brush.”
Given the variety presented, this task gives Shantelle the opportunity to distinguish between colors and types of brushes.

 

1 2 3 4 5 6